Fight for your right to Vape in the UK!

  • First off go to this page here and type in your post code, it will find all your local Politicians that can be contacted via email and automatically creates a standard email for you.
  • Now you are going to have to enter text detailing why you are contacting them and what your expectations are, the following should hopefully give you a good starting point, full credit goes to Clive Bates Blog

What to say

It is important that you write in your own words, based on your own experience and express your own views.  I must stress this – authenticity really matters.
A good letter to an MP or MEP might have the following main components:
  1. About you and your experience – eg. have you tried to quit smoking? What effect has vaping had on you? What experience have you had of e-cigarettes? What you think of the threshold e-liquids?
  2. Why you think what is proposed will be bad, especially if it is bad for you personally
  3. What you think should be done, and what you would like them personally to do
  4. Questions that make sure you get a response: ask questions, ask for a reply and/or ask for a meeting
  • This is the picture that was suggested as being a good handout for local vape shops.

DOT Issues New Flight Safety Rule for E-Cigarettes


WASHINGTONIn its continuing effort to improve transportation safety, the U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration today issued an interim final rule (IFR) to prohibit passengers and crewmembers from carrying battery-powered portable electronic smoking devices (e.g. e-cigarettes, e-cigs, e-cigars, e-pipes, personal vaporizers, electronic nicotine delivery systems) in checked baggage and prohibit passengers and crewmembers from charging the devices and/or batteries on board the aircraft.

“We know from recent incidents that e-cigarettes in checked bags can catch fire during transport,” said Transportation Secretary Anthony Foxx. “Fire hazards in flight are particularly dangerous.  Banning e-cigarettes from checked bags is a prudent safety measure.”

On January 22, 2015, the Federal Aviation Administration issued a Safety Alert for Operators recommending that air carriers require their passengers to carry e-cigarettes and related devices exclusively in the cabin of the aircraft.  Also, on June 9, 2015, the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) published an addendum to the 2015-2016 ICAO Technical Instructions for the Safe Transport of Dangerous Goods by Air prohibiting the carriage of e-cigarettes in checked baggage and restricting the charging of these devices while on board the aircraft.

“The importance of the safety of the flying public provides good cause for our issuing an IFR,” said PHMSA Administrator Marie Therese Dominguez. “E-cigarettes in checked bags present a safety risk because they are capable of generating extreme heat, which could lead to a fire on board the aircraft.”

Passengers may continue to carry e-cigarettes for personal use in carry-on baggage or on their person but may not use them on flights.  The Department’s current regulatory ban on smoking of tobacco products on passenger flights includes the use of electronic cigarettes.  Nevertheless, to prevent passenger or crewmember confusion, the Department has proposed to amend its existing airline smoking rule to explicitly ban use of electronic cigarettes aboard aircraft.

The IFR does not prohibit a passenger from carrying other devices containing batteries for personal use (such as laptop computers, cell phones, cameras, etc.) in checked or carry-on baggage, nor does it restrict a passenger from transporting batteries for personal use in carry-on baggage.

An e-cigarette is a battery-powered device that simulates tobacco smoking by producing a heated vapor, which resembles smoke.

The IFR is effective seven days after publication in the Federal Register. For a copy of the IFR go to:

For more information on FAA’s Safety Alert for Operators, go to:

The Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration develops and enforces regulations for the safe, reliable, and environmentally sound operation of the nation’s 2.6 million mile pipeline transportation system and the nearly 1 million daily shipments of hazardous materials by land, sea, and air. Please visit or[external link] for more information.


PHMSA 14-15

Monday, October 26, 2015

– See more at:

We Don’t Need ‘Decades of Research’ to Know Vaping Is Safer Than Smoking

A chemical comparison shows e-cigarettes are far less hazardous than tobacco cigarettes.

If Holger did not mean to address the relative hazards of vaping and smoking, it is confusing, to say the least, that he opens the original article with this question: “Are e-cigarettes really any better than smoking a cigarette?” More to the point, an article about the potential health hazards of vaping that fails to talk about how those hazards compare to the well-established risks posed by smoking is irresponsible, especially since regular users of e-cigarettes consist mainly of current or former smokers.

For a smoker contemplating a switch to vaping, it is worse than unhelpful to say, as Holger does, that “e-cigarettes pose dangers to our health,” that they “carry their fair share of toxic chemicals,” or that they “have negative effects on lungs.” The relevant question is how the risks of vaping compare to the risks of smoking, and there is no question that they are much lower. By implying otherwise, e-cigarette alarmists may very well deter smokers from making a switch that could save their lives.

Holger claims to be agnostic on the question of whether vaping is safer than smoking, and he thinks this is a scientific position. It isn’t.

“Sullum is right that I had no intention of answering this question,” he says in his reply. “I don’t have the answer because the jury is still out. It could potentially take decades of research before we know the long-term effects of e-cigarettes compared to smoking.”

This seemingly cautious position is not only wrong but reckless. We already know, based on the fact that e-cigarettes do not burn tobacco or anything else, coupled with chemical analyses of the aerosol they produce, that they are much less dangerous than conventional cigarettes. According to what Public Health England (PHE) calls the “best estimate” of the difference in risk, vaping is about 95 percent safer than smoking.

Holger is unimpressed. “Even if e-cigarettes are ‘95% less harmful’ than cigarettes,” he says, “that doesn’t mean they are safe.” In a world where nothing is 100 percent safe, this mindless insistence on the complete elimination of risk is a menace to public health. An alternative to smoking that’s 95 percent safer is a huge opportunity that should be welcomed by anyone who wants to reduce tobacco-related harm.

Might the current estimate of the difference in risk be off by a few percentage points? Sure. That’s why it’s called an estimate. But such a correction would not affect the conclusion that smokers who switch to vaping dramatically reduce the health risks they face. That would still be true even if the estimate exaggerated the difference by a factor of two, although there is no reason to think it does. In fact, it’s possible that the actual risk reduction is higher than 95 percent. “Some flavourings and constituents in e-cigarettes may pose risks over the long term,” says Ann McNeill, co-author of the PHE report. “We consider the 5% residual risk to be a cautious estimate allowing for this uncertainty.”

It is true that we don’t know exactly what the long-term health effects of vaping are. Although propylene glycol and vegetable glyercin, the main components of e-cigarette “vapor,” are approved as safe food and drug ingredients, a widespread practice of inhaling aerosols containing these substances is relatively new. But contrary to what Holger implies, that does not mean we need “decades of research” to know whether smoking is more dangerous than vaping. Whatever the long-term effects of inhaling propylene glycol or glyercin, they cannot possibly compare to the long-term effects of inhaling the numerous toxins and carcinogens in tobacco smoke. Hence it is journalistic, medical, and public health malpractice to tell a smoker who is thinking about trying e-cigarettes that he should wait a few decades until the evidence is clearer.

New CDC Data Suggest E-Cigarettes Are Helping Smokers Quit

The same survey finds that never-smokers rarely become regular vapers.

People who welcome e-cigarettes as an alternative to the conventional kind hope they will help smokers quit, thereby dramatically reducing the health risks they face. People who fear e-cigarettes worry that vaping will encourage smoking among people who otherwise never would have tried tobacco by getting them hooked on nicotine. New survey data from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) provide evidence that top officials at that agency are wrong to favor the latter view.

According to the 2014 National Health Interview Survey, 13 percent of American adults have tried an e-cigarette, including 48 percent of current smokers, 55 percent of “recent” quitters (defined as respondents who had last smoked less than a year before the survey), 9 percent of “long-term” quitters (defined as respondents who had last smoked a year or more before the survey), and just 3 percent of people who have never smoked. The same survey found that 4 percent of adults were current e-cigarettes users (meaning they vaped “every day” or “some days”), including 16 percent of current smokers, 22 percent of recent quitters, 2 percent of long-term quitters, and just 0.4 percent of never-smokers.


In other words, never-smokers rarely become regular vapers, which suggests the CDC’s fears are misplaced, especially since there is no evidence that never-smokers who vape are therefore more likely to become smokers or that the rising popularity of e-cigarettes has given a boost to conventional cigarettes. To the contrary, vaping and smoking rates are moving in opposite directions. The CDC’s survey data suggest that’s more than a coincidence: Not only was vaping much more common among current and former smokers than among never-smokers, but current smokers who had tried to quit in the previous year were more likely to be vapers than those who had not.


Specifically, 55 percent of smokers who had tried to quit in the previous year were ever-vapers, compared to 40 percent of smokers who had not tried to quit. The rates for current e-cigarette use were 20 percent and 12 percent, respectively. It looks like e-cigarettes may very well play an important role in moving away from the real thing.

[via Michael Siegel]

%d bloggers like this: